<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS overflow vertical toolbar problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daobydesign.com/blog/2007/11/css-overflow-vertical-toolbar-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daobydesign.com/blog/2007/11/css-overflow-vertical-toolbar-problem/</link>
	<description>Tips on blogging, design and the IT industry.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.daobydesign.com/blog/2007/11/css-overflow-vertical-toolbar-problem/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daobydesign.com/blog/2007/11/13/css-overflow-vertical-toolbar-problem/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Couldn't agree more re: the head-scratcher of why some browsers still don't conform to the W3C specs.

Good point re: images. I was only using text, and didn't test for what happens when large images are brought into the mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more re: the head-scratcher of why some browsers still don&#8217;t conform to the W3C specs.</p>
<p>Good point re: images. I was only using text, and didn&#8217;t test for what happens when large images are brought into the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.daobydesign.com/blog/2007/11/css-overflow-vertical-toolbar-problem/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daobydesign.com/blog/2007/11/13/css-overflow-vertical-toolbar-problem/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>What is good for FF is not good for IE.
What is good for IE is not good for FF.

It's amazing that browsers cannot meet the W3C specs in the same way. I've hit similar problems with divs and trying to support both FF and IE. Watch out for images that are wider than the div. In FF it works fine. In IE things go crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is good for FF is not good for IE.<br />
What is good for IE is not good for FF.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing that browsers cannot meet the W3C specs in the same way. I&#8217;ve hit similar problems with divs and trying to support both FF and IE. Watch out for images that are wider than the div. In FF it works fine. In IE things go crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
